February 7, 2008

 Navigation

   Home Page

 News & Features

   News

 Columns & Opinions

   Publisher's Note

   Boomers

   Pinings

   Longshots

   Techie

 Pop Culture

   Film

   TV

   Books
   Video Games
   CD Reviews

 Living

   Food

   Wine

   Beer

 Music

   Articles

   Music Roundup

   Live Music/DJs

   MP3 & Podcasts

   Bandmates

 Arts

   Theater

   Art

 Find A Hippo

   Manchester

   Nashua

 Classifieds

   View Classified Ads

   Place a Classified Ad

 Advertising

   Advertising

   Rates

 Contact Us

   Hippo Staff

   How to Reach The Hippo

 Past Issues

   Browse by Cover


Yahoo! It’s Microsoft!
Another one bites the dust?
By John “jaQ” Andrews  jandrews@hippopress.com

On Feb. 1, Microsoft announced to the world that it had just offered nearly $45 billion to buy Yahoo!

(No, I’m not that excited about this news. The exclamation point, whether I like it or not — and I don’t — is part of Yahoo!’s name. See, right there, an apostrophe right after an exclamation point? Horrid. Still, it’s their name, and I’ll respect that, however begrudgingly. Anyway.)

Much has already been written on the business implications of the deal, should it go through. But what might the Internet landscape look like? If a Microsoft-Yahoo! merger really is aimed at taming Google’s dominance of online search and services, how will the average Netizen’s surfing habits change? Maybe a little, maybe a lot.

First, I wouldn’t worry about your e-mail address. When Microsoft bought Hotmail in 1997, users of the free service didn’t suddenly have “@msn.com” at the end of their e-mail addresses. Millions of Yahoo! Mail users would probably storm Microsoft headquarters if they all had to notify their friends, families and spam senders that their addresses were changing. Besides, there are likely to be quite a few user names that are duplicated between the two companies’ services, so merging hippojaq@yahoo.com, hippojaq@msn.com and hippojaq@hotmail.com, which may or may not all be the same person, would be much more hassle than it’s worth. The same goes for the companies’ two instant messengers, which are already interoperable.

On the other hand, there is precedent for scrapping old branding. In 2002, Microsoft bought a company called Vicinity, which ran a Web site called MapBlast — your standard driving directions site. Microsoft quickly shoved Vicinity’s technology and features behind its own pre-existing MapPoint name. Yahoo! Maps could suffer the same fate.

Each company has such a long list of services, though, that it’s hard to imagine either branding just disappearing. Pull up Yahoo.com or MSN.com and see for yourself: right on their home pages, both sites advertise instant messaging, personals, movie listings, yellow pages, job boards and a plethora of other stuff. None of that will go away; realistically, both sites will have to remain up to capitalize on existing users, but individual services might consolidate under one or the other banner.

Take HotJobs, Yahoo!’s job search. It had a long and well-known life before being acquired by Yahoo!, so being tied to one or the other brand isn’t that important. Each company serves up news stories, but Microsoft’s link to the TV news world through MSNBC can bring more gravitas to Yahoo!’s coverage.

What will really change for you, the user, is that your choice will no longer be between Google and those other guys, but between Google, MSYahoo! (or whatever it’ll be called) and those really tiny other guys. Google started out as a streamlined startup that did one thing — search — incredibly well, but it’s ballooned into many of the same services other Web portals offer.

What really has Microsoft worried is Google’s Apps section, including editing tools for word processing and spreadsheet documents. Microsoft has plenty of competition in that arena already, from Corel’s WordPerfect and the free, open source OpenOffice.org to dozens of lesser-known office suites, but Google’s offering is unique in that it’s all accessed online. The applications are online and your documents are stored in an online account. Hardcore business users who need more features can pay $50 a year for an account, but most users can access everything for free.

What Yahoo! really offers Microsoft isn’t innovative technology, but a user base and penetration that will let Microsoft peddle its own online applications to a wider audience. The software giant has been trying to migrate from purchased CDs to subscription software for ages now, and this might be just the kick they need.