Next On Netflix

Director Tyler Spindel talks new film, The Wrong Missy

Manchester native Tyler Spindel made his Netflix directorial debut in 2018 with Father of the Year, a comedy starring David Spade. On May 13, Netflix released The Wrong Missy, another comedy directed by Spindel, also starring Spade. At one point it was the No. 1 most-watched film on Netflix, and it was still in the Top 10 at No. 7 as of May 26. While quarantined in his apartment in Los Angeles, Spindel — who graduated from Central High School and is the nephew of Adam Sandler — talked about his latest directorial success.

What is The Wrong Missy about?
It’s about a guy who goes on this horrible blind date, and then, later, he meets the girl of his dreams. He wants to invite the girl of his dreams [to go] on this corporate retreat with him to Hawaii but [she and the girl from the blind date] have similar names, and he accidentally invites the wrong girl, who is basically a terror. … There are a lot of ridiculous situations and crazy, zany characters. It’s a really silly, outlandish movie that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

How did you end up directing it?
Kevin Grady, who produced the movie and is also from Manchester … found the script and sent it to me, and I really liked it and thought it was funny. We thought David Spade would be really good for the lead guy, Tim. We sent [the script] to him, and he liked it. Everything started to fall into place after that.

What appealed to you about the script?
I thought it was a relatable situation, because I think a lot of people have texted the wrong person, including myself; I’ve done it many many many times.

Where was the film shot?
We shot it all in Hawaii, in Oahu. It’s gorgeous there. Getting to shoot a movie in Hawaii was amazing; it was a dream.

What was it like working with David Spade again?
It’s awesome. We have so much fun together and are good friends. Nobody’s a nicer guy, and nobody’s a sharper comedian. He’s a really good actor, too. His instincts are really good, and his innate [acting] ability is really good. If you give him [a directorial] note, he always interprets it perfectly. He’s one of the best [actors] I’ve ever worked with.

Why did you think Spade would be a good fit for the lead role in The Wrong Missy?
It’s interesting, because in this movie he’s playing the straight man, whereas in Father of the Year he’s playing the comic foil. … One of my favorite movies of all time is Tommy Boy, which is an old David Spade [and] Chris Farley movie, and in it … Spade played this sarcastic, straight guy, and I always thought he was really good in it. That’s why I thought he’d fit really well with this character [in The Wrong Missy], and it was cool to work with him in a different capacity … and to see how broad his skill set is.

How did you feel when you heard that The Wrong Missy had become the No. 1 most-watched movie on Netflix?
It’s a trip. It’s surreal. I’ve been getting messages from people around the world, and I go online and see videos of people in different countries watching the movie, and it’s really amazing. I can’t believe it’s happening.

How have you grown as a director between Father of the Year and The Wrong Missy?
After [directing] your first movie, you learn so much. You learn how to incorporate more movement into the camera work. You get better at working with the crew and the actors. You get better at knowing what you want and knowing what’s possible to do. You only have a limited amount of time [to shoot a film], so you learn a lot about what’s important as far as what you want to spend your time on, and what’s a waste [of time]. [Directing] is like anything else: you get better with experience.

How have you been spending your time in quarantine?
Mostly, I’ve just been really excited about the movie, but I’ve also been reading a ton of scripts, and I’ve been doing some writing for a couple different projects. There’s one script I’ve been working on a lot. … It’s a comedy, but it’s a little more grounded and has a little bit of a different tone [than Father of the Year and The Wrong Missy].
— Angie Sykeny

Education Funding

Stuff about things.

In 1999, the New Hampshire Supreme Court declared the state’s tax system to fund education ”unconstitutional” and gave the legislature a short window to come up with a plan to fix it. The legislature, reluctantly, picked a State Wide Education Property Tax (SWEPT) to address the Claremont Education Funding Lawsuit. The original formula passed by the legislature had a $6.60 SWEPT rate, which brought huge relief to about 80 percent of property owners while raising taxes on the property-richest communities who were/are paying the lowest tax rates in New Hampshire.
But the property-richest towns were not happy with the new formula and hired attorneys to come up with a plan. Their lawyers came up with a clever scheme called “donor towns” and many people bought into it, including many legislators.
So the formula was redone at a lower rate with a cap on how much money SWEPT could raise. Anyone with decent math/spatial reasoning skills could see that this new formula was wholly beneficial to the property-rich/lowest-tax-rate communities, designed to continuously reduce the tax rate and bring us back to the disparities that initially caused the Claremont lawsuit. Shame on New Hampshire for not having the intellectual horsepower and mathematical skills to see that this was a scam. The future was easy to see and is now here. Since the change was made, property-poorer cities and towns all over the state have been cheated out of hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue that had a Supreme Court decision to back it up.
Today, the lawsuits are coming back. The Conval district has already filed and is in the courts. More lawsuits are likely to come. We would not have been in this position had the legislature done the right thing and not kowtowed to the property-richest communities. You see, while they only represent about 20 to 25 percent of our citizens, they have a disproportionate percentage of the political clout among their residents.
So, with education funding once again in the courts, is there a case to be made that the monies lost by the property-poor communities over the years by the redone and unconstitutional formula be owed to the property-poorer communities? Manchester alone would likely be owed over $100 million. To be clear, if this were a lawsuit between two companies, those lost funds would be on the table.
Fred Bramante is a past chairman and member of the New Hampshire State Board of Education. He speaks and consults on education redesign to regional, state and national organizations.

Stay in the loop!

Get FREE weekly briefs on local food, music,

arts, and more across southern New Hampshire!